Collusion involves unauthorized collaboration on assessable work (written, oral or practical) with others, and is a form of cheating. Examples include but are not limited to:
- assisting another student to produce or substantially edit assessable work that is intended to be completed by the individual student
- allowing another person to substantially write or edit your work without the assessor’s knowledge
- allowing others to copy your work or your answers in an exam or other assessment tasks
- presenting group work as your own.
Contract cheating is a form of academic misconduct that occurs when a student submits work that has been completed by a third party. This can be paid or unpaid, and the source may be a contracting service, fellow student, graduate, friend or family member.
Find out more about Contract Cheating.
Plagiarism is the presentation of work, ideas or data of others as one’s own, without appropriate acknowledgment and referencing. Plagiarism also includes self-plagiarism. Examples include but are not limited to:
- the inclusion of one or more sentences from another person’s work, or tables, graphs, images, designs, computer programs, and any other data, ideas or work without the use of quotation marks and acknowledgment of the source and without referencing
- the use of one or more sentences from the work of another person where a few words have been changed or where the order of copied phrases/sentences has been changed
- copying the work of another student, with or without their agreement.
Inadequate referencing skills versus plagiarism
Plagiarism should be distinguished from what the evidence suggests is likely to be incomplete attempts by the student to acknowledge the words, work or ideas or others (e.g. where the student has made a genuine attempt to reference their work but has inadequate referencing skills).
Minor formatting errors in referencing style may also suggest the need for skills development and an educational response, rather than to treat the behaviour as minor or more serious plagiarism.
An educative response by its nature is non-punitive; it does not include deducting marks beyond the parameters of the usual marks allocated to the demonstration of referencing skills. In this instance, allocating a mark of zero is not an educative response. An educative response is most appropriate in the student’s first term.
Self-plagiarism involves the presentation of one’s own work for more than one assessment without acknowledgment and referencing. Examples include the reuse of all or part of one’s own work that has already been submitted for assessment in another unit or given academic credit without acknowledgment.
Another form of plagiarism is called ‘washing’, where Google Translate or other similar services are used to translate a plagiarised assessment into another language and then back again into English. It involves automatically substituted generated synonyms and phrases that create what seems to be a new document’. ‘Washing’ is unacceptable and indicates an intention to dishonestly present work that is not the student’s own work, and to disguise plagiarism.
For a full list of terms, visit the CQUniversity Glossary.